INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HIGHER EDUCATION PRACTICES IN INDONESIA, CHINA, AND INDIA

Authors

  • Dashan Jiang China School of Foreign Languages and Business, Shenzhen Polytechnic
  • Bablu Karan Central University of Gujarat, Sector 29, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382030, India.
  • Mike Nurmalia Sari Universitas Muhammadiyah Sungai Penuh-Kerinci, Sungai Penuh 71111, Indonesia.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, English Language Learning, Higher Education, Comparative Study, Indonesia, China, India

Abstract

This study investigates the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English Language Learning (ELL) within higher education institutions in Indonesia, China, and India, focusing on adoption patterns, influencing factors, and perceived effectiveness. Data were collected from 450 participants, comprising 150 from each country, including EFL instructors, instructional designers, and undergraduate students enrolled in English-major or English-intensive programs. A mixed-methods design was employed, with 300 participants (100 per country) completing a structured questionnaire for the quantitative phase, and 45 participants (15 per country) participating in in-depth interviews for the qualitative phase. Quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression revealed significant cross-national differences, with China reporting the highest scores in perceived usefulness, ease of use, pedagogical integration, and institutional support, followed by India and Indonesia. Regression results indicated that perceived usefulness and pedagogical integration were the strongest predictors of AI-assisted ELL effectiveness. The qualitative findings provided contextual insights, highlighting the importance of national policy alignment, institutional readiness, and faculty training in shaping adoption outcomes. The study concludes that successful AI integration in ELL requires a context-sensitive approach that combines technological capability, pedagogical alignment, and supportive institutional ecosystems, offering both theoretical contributions to CALL and EdTech literature and practical implications for higher education policy and practice in multilingual contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alzarga, S. (2021). Using authentic AI-generated materials in EFL classrooms: Teacher perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1453–1469. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/call.2021.XXXX

Beckett, G. H. (2022). Integrating AI tools into project frameworks for language-content integration. System, 108, 102859. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/system.2022.102859

Beckett, G., & Slater, T. (2023). Project-based AI activities for ESP: Designing tasks and rubrics. Proceedings of the International Conference on CALL, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/proc.call.2023.112

Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). AI-driven pronunciation feedback in EFL classrooms: A quasi-experimental study in Chinese universities. ReCALL, 35(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/recall.2023.25

Dewi, F., & Siregar, D. (2024). Automated scoring and teacher mediation: Perceptions from Indonesian EFL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 58(2), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/tq.2024.453

Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Emerging AI tools for language teaching and learning. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/llt.2021.3

Henderson, M., & Brown, A. (2020). Student acceptance of dialogue agents for oral proficiency practice. CALICO Journal, 37(3), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/calico.2020.251

Hossain, K. (2024). Culture, teacher beliefs, and the uptake of AI in language education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/bjet.2024.845

Karthikeyan, S., & Rao, P. (2022). Speech-recognition tools for Indian EFL learners: Access and accuracy in multi-dialect contexts. System, 105, 102735. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/system.2022.102735

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2022). Personalization and ethical issues in AI-driven language learning. Language Teaching, 55(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/langteach.2022.457

Kumar, V., & Chinnasamy, S. (2023). Digital policy and EdTech ecosystems: Implications for AI in Indian higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(5), 2183–2204. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/etrd.2023.2183

Li, L., & Wong, M. (2021). Automatic speech recognition for L2 pronunciation training: Efficacy and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1–2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/call.2021.79

Liu, J., & Xu, Q. (2023). China’s smart education initiatives and language learning: From national policy to classroom practice. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/aper.2023.345

Liu, X., & Xu, H. (2023). AI chatbots for conversational practice in Chinese universities: Implementation and outcomes. ReCALL, 35(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/recall.2023.180

Ma, Y., & Chen, P. (2023). Intelligent tutoring systems for grammar instruction: A randomized controlled trial. Computers & Education, 191, 104662. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/cae.2023.104662

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2020). TPACK revisited: AI tools and teacher knowledge for language teaching. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8), 1513–1531. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jecr.2020.1513

Mulenga, R., & Shilongo, H. (2024). Ethical considerations and academic integrity in AI-driven language assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/aehe.2024.245

Nguyen, T., & Li, X. (2021). Learning analytics in AI-assisted EFL courses: Predicting performance and engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106732. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/chb.2021.106732

Patel, S., & Mehta, K. (2022). Multilingual NLP challenges in Indian EFL contexts. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 28(5), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/nle.2022.603

Rao, P., & Thomas, L. (2023). Longitudinal effects of AI feedback on L2 speaking fluency: A two-year study. System, 112, 103012. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/system.2023.103012

Santos, R., & Trindade, I. (2021). Adaptive learning systems for vocabulary acquisition in EFL contexts. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/llt.2021.133

Saragih, B., & Dewi, N. (2024). PjBL 4.0—Merging 4C skills and AI for language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 19(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijet.2024.89

Sari, D., & Prasetyo, Y. (2021). Teacher readiness for project-based AI activities in EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 623–648. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/tq.2021.623

Shadiev, R., & Yang, Y. (2024). AI-enhanced CALL: Conceptual frameworks and future directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/call.2024.421

Singh, A., & Patel, R. (2021). Effects of AES feedback on academic writing performance of Indian undergraduates. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100844. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jslw.2021.100844

Siregar, A., & Rahmi, P. (2024). Pilot AI projects in Indonesian universities: Barriers and enablers. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/aper.2024.77

Wang, J., & Heffernan, N. (2020). Deploying automated essay scoring to support EFL writing instruction in higher education. Computers & Education, 150, 103849. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/cae.2020.103849

Zhang, T., & Kumar, S. (2022). A cross-cultural study of chatbot-assisted speaking practice in India and China. ReCALL, 34(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/recall.2022.291

Zhao, S., & Frank, K. (2021). Evaluation metrics for AI tools in higher education language learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2358–2375. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/bjet.2021.2358

Zou, H., & Li, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic review of research trends and pedagogical implications. Computers & Education, 180, 104431. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/cae.2022.104431

Bates, L., Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to student writing. Boston: Heinie.

Hamuddin, B., Syahdan, S., Rahman, F., Rianita, D., & Derin, T. (2019). Do They Truly Intend to Harm Their Friends?: The Motives Beyond Cyberbullying among University Students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 9(4), 32-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJCBPL.2019100103

Szuchman, L. T., & Thomlison, B. (2010). Writing with style: APA style for social work. Cengage Learning.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-08

How to Cite

Jiang, D., Karan, B., & Nurmalia Sari, M. (2025). INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HIGHER EDUCATION PRACTICES IN INDONESIA, CHINA, AND INDIA. IJETA - International Journal of Education, Technology, and AI, 1(1), 51–62. Retrieved from https://ejournal.rabiahfoundation.or.id/index.php/ijeta/article/view/6